This portal provides an open platform for user feedback and product change requests. Anyone can add an idea and remain as a Guest, but please consider signing up so that others can see who has created the ideas!
Note: this is a public facing web portal, any text here can be viewed by anyone over the internet, so please consider carefully the content you wish to share and please do not post anything of a sensitive nature.
With many patients Community and Urgent care provision will be more regular and up to date information than the GP record, representing the at times daily care provision for patients, it's therefore important that the GP record is not seen in isolation. An example would be with the advent of the Virtual Wards held in Community records, patients could be receiving medications which would contraindicating to meds that might be provided in ED should they be transferred. Currently limited ToC mechanisms which this could support may not adequately mitigate this risk.
Thanks Ian. Yes, I'm sure the HTML views will add value as a first iteration.
The second iteration would add lots of value though (and mitigate risks of users missing information) - particularly if we could extract things like coded observations using known SNOMED code sets. e.g. Extracting coded values from clinical templates recorded in S1 community units and present in the Observations panel. That would be a game-changer for us.
hi Toby, as per the recent email:
As a first iteration, unless there is an agreement that this is not valuable - the intention is to display the HTML views as presented, and therefore separate. Consumers and Portal tenants can of course choose whether or not to take this particular data feed.
A second iteration can then be considered in terms of how information could be extracted from the HTML views and blended into existing panels. Unlike NHSD, TPP do not have any restrictions on how we display the data, but the technical feasibility and user experience still need to be evaluated.